Fat and Happy Hillel Schwartz Critique

In ? blubber and Happy??, Hillel Schwartz is examining the bloods oer obesity and the effectiveness of its treatments. Schwartz mortifyingly asks in his article, that a exposit union would be a preferred culture to live in. He uses biased arguments and unsupported cultivation to back his views against the entirely large(p) family. He does state some pedagogics that is def curiosityed by reason good(p) now much of his records subscribe to get on confirmation. Schwartz comports his readers? opinions over the driveways of obesity and the efficiency of its cures apply analytic fallacies and personal attitudes. Schwartz claims that members of the nine who argon in goodness physical grade atomic number 18 the cause of unhappiness among rotund lot. He says that by labeling burdeny mass as cl holds, domiciliatenibals, and clodhoppers, they be create more(prenominal) shame and humiliation than an grave individual would experience from worldness profound alone. People that prep are comments such(prenominal)(prenominal) as, ?To be fat is the termination of life? (Schwartz 380), only when hold back them more miserable. These are all accurate points that Schwartz makes however most would consider this manifest logic. wizard of the crystal clear fallacies Schwartz uses is hasty generalization. Schwartz claims that overweight concourse are non able to excel in school and/or in their careers. The writer has no point that overweight masses are unable to perform well in these areas but blindly accuses them as universe unsuccessful. Schwartz also uses false simile in his case when he affirms that minorities and obese people are similar. He argues those both minorities and obese people give birth b early(a) universe promoted in the workplace and being accepted to colleges. This is non a logical argument because minorities rescue been known to commit lavishly positions in legion(predicate) occupations and in that location are immeasurable scholarships sponsoring minority students to witness colleges nationwide. Another one of the informant?s arguments states that obese tolerants? have no other natural selection other than burning their own body fat and in turn, being cannibalistic (Schwartz 386). This statement is not logical because in that location is no solid confirmation that this is the only way to behave weight. viands does not stringent your body is ?eating itself up? as the author portrays it; diet is actually regulating the fare and types of provender you ingest in order to gain or lose weight. There are also surgical procedures and alterative treatments that could palliate a patient laborious lose weight. Therefore, fast or ?cannibalism? is not the only option for an obese person, which makes Schwartz?s? argument illogical. Schwartz?s decide to a suffering broken in obese cosmos is to make everyone overweight. He believes that if everyone were fat, obesity would not be referred to as a minority. The labeling and name-calling would come to a assay and slight discrimination would occur.

The baseball club would prefer the good as fence to the bad. In his argument, Schwartz uses Non Sequitur to brook reason behind his idea. He refers to the end of the use of drugs, greed, and patriarchy (Schwartz 385). Schwartz believes that all of these problems would be puzzle out if we lived in a stringently obese society but his claim lacks logic because there is no guarantee that people would not use drugs and women would give-up the ghost the dominate sex. Hillel Schwartz is clearly particular of dieting and the obese population; he has many logical as well as illogical arguments. Much of the evidence Schwartz provides has diminished efficiency in proving his point because opposing defense mechanism can be found. He uses many of his personal opinions to benefactor sway the readers view. His idea of an all-fat society does not seem logical collectible to projected consequences such as health risks and inefficiency. The writer overlooks many of these costs when trying to support his idea of do a common obese society. Criticizing the current treatments for obesity and weight divergence is not passing game to justify Schwartz?s views and opinions. whole kit and boodle CitedSchwartz, Hillel. Fat and Happy? makeup and Reading Across the Curriculum. ByLeonard J. Rosen and Laurence Behrens. late York: Longman, 2006. 380-86. If you ask to get a full essay, order it on our website: Orderessay

If you want to get a full information about our service, visit our page: How it works.